Hamas Agrees to Trump’s Ceasefire Proposal — But Lasting Peace in Palestine Possible?
DID Press: Following Hamas’s announcement of support for U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed ceasefire plan, DID Press Agency conducted a poll on public perceptions of the prospects for lasting peace in Palestine.
The results reveal deeply divided opinions among respondents, highlighting that long-standing political and territorial disputes between Palestinians and Israelis remain the key obstacles to sustainable peace.
Participants were asked to choose one of four options regarding the potential outcomes of the proposed ceasefire:
A) Durable peace if all sides remain committed – Only 10% of respondents selected this option, believing that lasting peace is possible if all parties fully adhere to the terms of the ceasefire.
B) Peace unlikely due to deep-rooted divisions – 17% said lasting peace remains unrealistic, citing entrenched political and territorial disputes that could only yield a temporary truce.
C) Temporary ceasefire likely, renewed conflict expected – The largest share, 31%, viewed ceasefire as a short-term measure, warning that past experience shows most ceasefires collapse quickly once new tensions emerge.
D) Real peace only through an independent Palestinian state – A majority of 42% asserted that permanent peace can only be achieved through the recognition and establishment of a fully sovereign Palestinian state within internationally accepted borders.
Expert Analysis
Regional analysts say Hamas’s approval of Trump’s ceasefire initiative could provide a brief opportunity to de-escalate the conflict but warn that fundamental disputes over land, refugees, and security remain unresolved.
According to Middle East observers, the ceasefire may open the door to more substantive negotiations, but without strong international guarantees and genuine political will from all sides, the process will remain fragile.
Many experts also caution that unilateral actions or externally imposed political pressure cannot replace direct dialogue between the parties. Previous short-term agreements without clear enforcement mechanisms have repeatedly collapsed, reigniting cycles of violence.
Conclusion
DID Press Agency poll suggests that most respondents hold pragmatic or cautious views about the prospects for peace. Only a small portion expressed optimism about a near-term, sustainable resolution.
Nonetheless, a significant majority believe that lasting peace in the region is possible only through the creation of an independent Palestinian state that guarantees the rights and security of its people.
The findings underscore that while ceasefires can temporarily reduce hostilities, genuine and lasting peace requires a comprehensive political settlement supported by the international community.